heroes
this last weekend i got to go to boston. thanksgiving in new england, how quaint, how fitting. it was a lot of fun. i tagged along with my sister jill and her husband steven to his brother's home in massachusetts. we literally went, i swear, over the river and through the woods to get there. it was a sweet little home (by that i mean a big old home) tucked up next to the woods in the back yard. every vantage point was a postcard in embryo. thanksgiving. food. good food. family. big and small. and of course giving thanks in thanksgiving fashion. it was a good holiday break i.e. break from the busy-ness of my ordinary life.
so while we were in boston, we saw some sights of course. and i re-had a previous epiphany. heroes are heroes. for those of you that have seen the japanese supo-moderno thematic rendition of hero-ing in "ping-pong" you know what i'm talking about. if you haven't check this link. peco my hero. anyway. we got heroes now too. and yes they are sometimes the men and women of the past. that's totally cool. i mean the likes of paul revere, thomas jefferson, john and herbie hancock. what i don't get, is why people wanna tell the dirt story. just to sell some print? what a waste of research. i don't care that the midnight ride of paul revere is not that accurate, or that thomas jefferson may or may not have had shady relations in his home. at the end of the day, these particular men were involved in the establishment of america and the subsequent revolutionization the entire political environment internal and external to the u.s. since their time. can we modernist even conceptualize our lifestlyes sans the documents produced by this elite group of heroes? who else has had that kind of lasting effect on humankind? so let's celebrate our heroes. stopping wasting documentary film on the backbiting and fighting behind the scenes of the beach boys or the beatles. our heroes were good enough to earn our respect. isn't it enough to allow them theirs without all the silly hillary clinton-esque re-writing of history?
to peco and smile, to jefferson and franklin, to george and samuel. we celebrate your deeds. flawed, of course. but who isn't? heroes are heroes yo.
20 Comments:
my first time to the shake-down or the world of blogging. but your mini-essays remind me of a quote by emerson that my professor always tells us, "Education is the drawing out of the Soul." By writing about experiences and things read, Emerson kept a journal of his personal and intellecutal development. similar to this blog, it is like having a personal panorama of not only your life, but of the times. I am sure this will be something that you will ever be grateful for. Media, politics, family, art, sports, heroes...intriguing, for we are looking at how you are "drawing out of the soul." so perhaps, i am grateful for those heroes who were willing to share what they thought, and acted upon it.
29/11/05 1:19 AM
e.m.m-
welcome to the shake-down. it's good to have ya.
29/11/05 1:09 PM
you comment on what's truly important and I agree with you. Heroes are heroes regardless of what happens behind closed doors or what they may or may not have done in other aspects of their lives. The men who had a hand in founding this great country, who sacrificed everything they had for freedom and liberty and the birth of a nation, and who are the pillars on which our modern day comforts and rights stand should be honored and respected. I don't think we show enough respect or gratitude for their role in our lives. Thanks for putting it so poetically.
29/11/05 3:13 PM
hey nice blog petey
29/11/05 11:05 PM
yes. lafe really reads these. if an 8 yr old can do it, then none of you have excuses for not blogging. he even haas his own blog at lafedog.blogspot.com., so go check him out.
nikki- welcome back, hope the other side didn't treat you too poorly for the holiday break.
30/11/05 7:20 AM
Who is e.m.m.? That was an interesting comment about how Peter is "drawing out of the soul." Peter - what happens to previous blogs when they drop off after a month? Can you save them? Have you printed them off? How can we watch the growth of your soul if they are not preserved.
30/11/05 12:44 PM
dad-
just check the archive link on the right side of the main page. you can access any of the old posts that way.
30/11/05 2:28 PM
I personally have no problem with seeing people for who they truly are. Hero or not, we all are people with real problems and real experiences. I prefer to know the true person rather than romantize the hero. Don't get me wrong they can still be heros but I like to see them more complete than just the story book version that history would like us to read an believe as truth. But hey, I guess thats the sociologist in me. Peter, you haven't changed my mind on this issue for 2 and half years now so I don't think you will with just one blog. Sorry. Can we still be friends?
30/11/05 3:07 PM
P.S. Sometimes knowing the complete person makes them more of a hero to me.
30/11/05 3:08 PM
should i be surprised to hear comments like that from aimee. no. why not, you ask? like i mentioned in the blog, some like to muck-rack clintonize historical figures. and that's how they validate hero-ism. i take that point. but yet, one if by land, two if by see would carry no weight at all if the clintons of the world could rework history.
30/11/05 4:52 PM
it really has nothing to do with your senator or any of her family....
30/11/05 6:07 PM
hey, um, did you know alien robots are real? they come to hurt and harm us. they are in everything and want to pursue the pursuers.
so i have a few things to say. first, i have never met aimee, but i do know she wrote 'romantize.' um...so her comments are invalid.
also, don't pretend you don't love the clintons. that is so something hitler would do.
well, i hope to meet aimee sometime. and i hope to meet hillary sometime. i wonder if i'll ever meet jefferson. maybe i'll meet andrew jackson. i'm reading the petticoat affair right now and its about the jacksonian white house, but i can't get past the first 100 pages and i end up reading escapist literature instead.
i think i'm going to stop posting on these things.
30/11/05 6:24 PM
Romanticize. Excuse me. And I don't pretend to love the Clintons. I hope we can meet someday too. I sure you're a peach.
30/11/05 10:17 PM
aimee- you gotta love frandsen men. even the ones you haven't met yet. i also though it was funny that you tried the evil-association game with your descriptive pronoun "your senator"
but you're right, romaniticization of people is a little modern china-ish, but still historical figures are such because of what they did for history. not what may or may be interpreted by the handwriting, like in the silly accusation of lincoln's "gay" memos. come on. that's annoying.
30/11/05 10:29 PM
Thanks Petey. The other side was fantastic and it was the best way to have a break... wish you could have been there.
1/12/05 12:51 PM
wat the heck
there was only 4 now there is 16
1/12/05 7:25 PM
my excuse for not blogging much...3 kids, not a long enough nap time, nor enough time to look up really long words to sound like a "self-proclaimed intellectual." In the meantime, I'll drop a line when I'm able. But really, Peter, how often do you use a dictionary or a thesaurus before posting your comments? Honestly...
1/12/05 11:51 PM
jill-
a) honestly i never use a dictionary or a thesaurus when i write. however, i do need them sometimes when i read steven's blog. but those are all my own words.
2) nor am i a self-proclaimed intellectual. you can indentify those types whenever you hear the word "uber." only those who feel extra smart, i.e. smarter than others will use that word
2/12/05 4:54 PM
prolific writing goes on in a week's time... I am sure this note is dated, but in response to you dad, emm stands for "emily mieko mitarai." I am a friend from the JACL/OCA Washington DC trip Peter, Tim, and Elise went on this past spring. Thanks for the welcoming sheldon.
6/12/05 12:27 AM
no problem. haven't heard from you in a bit. good to see you're still surviving byu...
6/12/05 9:25 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home